"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)" <harald.k...@nsn.com> wrote:
>> There are some good reasons why a switchover could be an appropriate
>> means in case the DB is facing troubles. It may be that the root
>> cause is not the DB itsself, but used resources or other things
>> which are going crazy and hit the DB first
 
> Would an example of this be that one drive in a RAID has gone bad and
> the hot spare rebuild has been triggered, leading to poor performance
> for a while?  Is that the sort of issue where you see value?

How would that be connected to a "no restart on crash" setting?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to