On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Robert Haas<robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > If Hot Standby were ready to be applied, I would be all in favor of > that, but in fact I don't believe that's the case. There's been no > movement on Hot Standby since February
Well Simon was happy with it as submitted so unless people are reading the patch and giving feedback or using it and running into problems I wouldn't really expect him to make changes. That's part of the problem with leaving patches outside the source tree while they're being developed. It's part of what led us to suddenly have a massive reviewing job and making big changes in the final commitfest. If we apply things earlier in the cycle we can be a lot less conservative. We don't have to be 100% sure everything was dealt with in a single commit. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
