Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I think we used to do it more or less like that, but people > didn't like it because they couldn't do any long-range planning. Well, obviously the 8.4 release cycle did little to help them. As has already been observed, there is a crying need to say "no" at some point to get a release out. It might actually help to do that on big patches if we don't let too many tiny ones accumulate. I seem to remember the argument being tossed about that "we might as well keep working on this one because there's all these others to wrap up." -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
