On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM, A.M.<age...@themactionfaction.com> wrote: > > How would I go about generating a meaningful backtrace for a plpgsql > function that calls a plperl function? One would also expect a C function > which calls a plpgsql function to appear, too, no? Shouldn't there be a > unified backtrace subsystem? >
i guess, that is what Alvaro is suggesting -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
