Committed. Fujii Masao wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the >> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion >> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this >> until the tree opens for 8.5. > > That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5. > >> It's not a very likely scenario that >> anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on >> it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense.... > > My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres > (old libpq.so). > > Regards, >
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
