On Monday 20 July 2009 17:52:44 Joshua Brindle wrote: > That is your (and the communities) prerogative. Linus wasn't very > supportive of SELinux in the kernel either but it is the only way Linux got > an EAL4+ LSPP evaluation for use in certain government systems. I > personally would love to see an open source DBMS evaluated for systems like > this because the current state of the art is fairly sad.
This would actually be a reasonable baseline to work against, if we define a project goal to be satisfying this standard. This is presumably the web site that describes this standard: http://www.niap- ccevs.org/cc-scheme/pp/pp_os_ls_v1.b/ There I see Succeeded By: pp_os_ml_mr2.0_v1.91 Sunset Date: 16 September 2007 And the successor document is vastly more comprehensive than implementing a MAC scheme. So how do we realistically get from here to there (and where is "there")? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
