Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I wonder whether we should retire -o.

> How about putting -o stuff after -p?  That way only postmaster
> code can set PGC_POSTMASTER options for a backend, no way for
> user to mess up.  ATM this would break -o -F tho'.

Indeed.  If we're going to force people to change their scripts anyway,
IMHO we might as well go all the way...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to