Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >> Rebased to correct for pg_indent changes. > > Thanks for doing that. No problem. I think I still owe you a few. :-) > Attached is a further small improvement that gets rid of the > find_ready_items() scans. After re-reading the patch I realized > that it wasn't *really* avoiding O(N^2) behavior ... but this > version does. I'll run a fresh set of benchmarks. By the way, I muffed the setup of last night's benchmarks, so no new information there, except that in the process of reviewing the attempt I discovered I was guilty of making a false assertion yesterday, based on remembering incorrectly. The logs show that the six hour dump to custom format was over the LAN. :-( I hope I didn't waste too much of people's time by saying otherwise. I'll try to get some numbers on the same-box dump soon. (Note to self: never, ever trust your memory; always confirm.) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
