Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might
>> want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug.
> Yes, if that's what we want then definitely branch. I guess the branch
> will (almost) only ever have exactly one commit on it.
Yeah, I'd expect so; but it seems like a good idea to leave room for the
possibility of more than one commit. I was first thinking that we'd
just release a new alpha from CVS HEAD if the evil-bug situation comes
up. However, if we've already done a catversion bump or some other
incompatible change in HEAD, that wouldn't be very practical.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
