Brendan Jurd <dire...@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, I tried this and as it turns out the patch casts the value to a
> float8 in order to pass it on to snprintf for sci-notation formatting.
Well, that's pretty dumb. Quite aside from the range problem, that
would mean that you lose everything past the sixteenth or so digit.
I think that's sufficient grounds for bouncing the patch back for
rework right there.
What I'd consider instead is calling numeric_out and then working
with the result of that. It would always be f-format, so you'd
have to do your own conversion to e-format, but you could do it
without any risk of precision or range loss.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
