Kevin Grittner wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
Excluding every database that has a composite/array-of
user-defined-type/enum type would be pretty nasty. After all, these
are features we boast of.
Any idea whether domains are an issue? I was thinking of trying this
tool soon, and we don't seem to be using any of the problem features
-- unless type issues include domains.
I don't believe that they are an issue. The issue arises only when a
catalog oid is used in the on-disk representation of a type. AFAIK the
on-disk representation of a domain is the same as its base type.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
