Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> It's going to be fairly grotty whatever we do. I'm worried a bit that
> we'll be providing some footguns, but I guess we'll just need to hold
> our noses and do whatever it takes.
Yeah. One advantage of the GUC approach is we could make 'em SUSET.
I don't actually see any particularly serious risk of abuse there
(about all you could do is make your CREATEs fail) ... but why not
be careful ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
