On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:48:33AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Which isn't exactly a good programming habit.
I couldn't agree more.
> In the above code local, in-scope variables are also replaced
> with ECPG_informix_set_var() and _get_var() calls.
> Totally unnecessary, or totally necessary even in non-compatible
> mode, depending on which leg I stand on. If you move the
> struct/union unrolling into adjust_informix() and handle arrays,
> ECPGdump_a_struct() won't be needed then.
Yeah, right, and you also add this hack to all applications. No.
> Because that example contradicts all sensible programming habits.
> (Well, what is "sensible" is different between people, so don't take it
> personal.)
Hey, don't blame me! Informix uses this feature to some extend, this is why it
got implemented. If you look into the source code you will see this:
* This breaks standard and leads to some very dangerous programming.
* Since they do, we have to work around and accept their syntax as
well.
* But we will do so ONLY in Informix mode.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: mes...@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
