Dne 7.08.09 00:13, Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala <zdenek.kot...@sun.com> writes:
It seems to me that editline never distributed history.h file and
HAVE_EDITLINE_HISTORY_H is nonsense. But I'm not sure.
I wouldn't count on that, in part because there are so many versions of
editline. On an OS X machine I see
$ ls -l /usr/include/*line*
/usr/include/editline:
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6882 Feb 19 2008 readline.h
/usr/include/readline:
total 16
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Jul 23 11:31 history.h@ -> ../editline/readline.h
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Jul 23 11:31 readline.h@ -> ../editline/readline.h
It is only hack for application which wants to have readline and they
don't detects libedit. Finally it is like:
#include <editline/readline.h>
#include <editline/readline.h>
I little bit searching on Internet and it seems that when edit/history.h
exists it is link to editline/readline.h. (See e.g.
http://sysinf0.klabs.be/usr/include/editline/history.h?dist=;arch= )
This link is created by packager, because when you compiling libedit,
make install does not create it.
By my opinion HAVE_EDITLINE_HISTORY_H is overhead, but we can keep it.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
