On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Sam Mason <s...@samason.me.uk> writes: >> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:50:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> No, I'm worried about code that supposes that it can divide by (x - y) >>> after testing that FPeq(x,y) is not true. point_sl() for instance. > >> OK, but I'm still not sure what you're getting at. > > Underflow. x!=y does not imply (x-y) != 0, if x and y are sufficiently > small and close together. The difference could underflow to zero.
Actually I don't think subtraction can underflow with IEEE floats but I don't think we want to count on IEEE floats everywhere. Even if we did there's the risk on intel that FPeq() gets called on values which have just been calculated and are still in registers but then get spilled to RAM and lose precision before the division happens. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
