> >> Considering that we are worried about someday having to adjust to a >> SQL standard in this area, I think we ought to be as conservative as >> possible about what we introduce as user-visible features here. >> As an example, if they do go with "=>" as the parameter marker, >> mixed notation would become a seriously bad idea because it would be >> impossible to distinguish incidental use of => as an operator from >> mixed notation. >
I thing, so ANSI will be in conformance with Oracle - so I'll try to check the possibility of the using => as any operator in Oracle regards Pavel Stehule -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
