Tom Lane escribió: > BTW, this patch adds more NUM_cache_remove() calls. I'm planning > to commit it that way, unless you're just about to commit your PG_TRY > change? I agree with doing that, but figured it should be a separate > commit.
No, go ahead, I will commit that separately. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
