> You are attacking here two things: > > a) schemas, which should be done in 7.3,
Is imho something different alltogether. (I know we have two opposed views here) > thus multiple databases on same host would be unnecessary. I disagree :-) > > b) connections to remote host' databases, which is partially implemented > already (in a ugly way, but...) see contrib/dblink > > What you described is a syntactic sugar to implement b) which isn't a bad > idea, but just consider, it is already done. sorta. Not in the least. True remote access needs 2 phase commit, which is nowhere near the horizon. Remote read only access would be somewhat easier to implement, and would imho be a very useful first step. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
