2009/8/9 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Oh, another thing: the present restriction that all function parameters > after the first one with a default must also have defaults is based on > limitations of positional call notation. Does it make sense to relax > that restriction once we allow named call notation, and if so what > should we do exactly? (This could be addressed in a followup patch, > it doesn't necessarily have to be dealt with immediately.) >
Yes, this rule should be useless. But with the remove of this rule, we have to modify algorithm for positional notation. It depends on this rule. regards Pavel Stehule > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
