Tom Lane escreveu:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eu...@timbira.com> writes:
>> Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>>> Possibly, but there aren't going to be any new translations within the
>>> next two days. We may want to reconsider this for the next alpha.
>>>
>> IMHO, it's too much work for an alpha cycle. Why not encourage it _only_
>> after
>> the last commitfest?
>
> But the translation work is incremental, no? You might waste some
> effort if the same message is changed more than once in a devel cycle,
> but I doubt that's a big problem. Not having to do all the work on a
> tight deadline at the end seems well worth it.
>
I know it is worth doing incremental translation work but I'm talking about
the alpha cycle. We'll need to give time to translators and apply those
modifications. I think it is too much time for an alpha release.
Are you proposing encourage translation without giving time to translate after
the end of commitfest? If so, I think we always give such a choice ('cause the
translations are in PGFoundry); we just need some committer to grab those
modifications and apply to CVS. +1 to add this step to alpha release process.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
