Alvaro Herrera píše v pá 21. 08. 2009 v 17:48 -0400:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'd still like to have some fork-rate-limiting behavior in there
> > somewhere. However, it might make sense for the avlauncher to do that
> > rather than the postmaster. Does that idea seem more implementable?
>
<snip>
>
> Does it just need a longer delay?
I see two problem with delay. First is how big it should be? It depends
on machine speed and load. And second is that it can be interrupted by
signal.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
