Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 15:02, Stef Walter<stef-l...@memberwebs.com> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:58, Stef Walter<stef-l...@memberwebs.com> wrote: >>>> Attached is a new patch, which I hope addresses all the concerns raised. >>> I think you forgot to actually attach the patch.... >> Whoops. Here it is. > > Is there any actual advantage to using getifaddr() on Linux,
It is in my opinion, it is the most modern and maintainable of the methods for obtaining network interface address information. Various unixes have added support for getifaddr() over the years, and (again my opinion) would probably continue to do so. > and not > just use SIOCGIFCONF for all Unixen? I do know that using SIOCGIFCONF on AIX comes with strange wrinkles and variable length data structures etc... getifaddrs() on AIX is a far more maintainable interface. That said, I'll adjust the patch as you feel is best for the long term inclusion in the postgresql source. Cheers, Stef -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
