On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 04:40, Itagaki > Takahiro<itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > There might be some places to replace it to strlcpy() instead. > > Can't comment on that without looking at the code, but it wouldn't surprise > me.
There are some performance tradeoffs between these variants, and we already did change all (most?) of the not performance-critical calls to strlcpy a while ago. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
