Given the desire to defer pinning the type of a literal, for better
support of user defined types, I think the current semantics of all
the conditional expressions:
 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/functions-conditional.html
 
are somewhat broken.
 
As a quick sample of something which I believe implements the correct
semantics for COALESCE and NULLIF, see the functions below.  I'm not
suggesting that it would be best to treat these as functions, just
showing what I think the correct semantics would be.  I also think
that the ease of definition shows that such an interpretation would
not necessarily be fairly characterized as a huge wart on the type
system.
 
create function "coalesce"(v1 unknown, v2 unknown)
returns unknown language plpgsql as
'begin if v1 is not null then return v1; end if; return v2; end;';
 
create function "coalesce"(v1 anyelement, v2 anyelement)
returns anyelement language plpgsql as
'begin if v1 is not null then return v1; end if; return v2; end;';
 
create function "nullif"(v1 unknown, v2 unknown)
returns unknown language plpgsql as
'begin if v1 = v2 then return null; end if; return v1; end;';
 
create function "nullif"(v1 anyelement, v2 anyelement)
returns anyelement language plpgsql as
'begin if v1 = v2 then return null; end if; return v1; end;';
 
select "coalesce"(null, null), pg_typeof(("coalesce"(null, null)));
 coalesce | pg_typeof
----------+-----------
          | unknown
(1 row)

select "coalesce"(null, '1'), pg_typeof(("coalesce"(null, '1')));
 coalesce | pg_typeof
----------+-----------
 1        | unknown
(1 row)

select "coalesce"('1', '2'), pg_typeof(("coalesce"('1', '2')));
 coalesce | pg_typeof
----------+-----------
 1        | unknown
(1 row)

select "coalesce"(null, '1'::text), pg_typeof(("coalesce"(null,
'1'::text)));
 coalesce | pg_typeof
----------+-----------
 1        | text
(1 row)

select "coalesce"(null, 1), pg_typeof(("coalesce"(null, 1)));
 coalesce | pg_typeof
----------+-----------
        1 | integer
(1 row)
 
The CASE predicate would also need to behave in this manner.  Probably
GREATEST and LEAST, as well.
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to