On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Folks, > > CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having > discussions with a number of people, and the result of those > discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest > insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann, > Stephen Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what > we're calling patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions > around a patch don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited, > Returned with Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the > CommitFest overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're > tentatively looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing > by topic, as follows: > > Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages Stephen Frost: > Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous Selena Deckelmann: Performance, > Clients > > Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel > free to reply here. > > And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many > endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for > which I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest > is to have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of > reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those > people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers! > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
I'm in :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
