Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I think the proposal to put a hook here is an end-run to try to avoid
> getting a detailed feature proposal past the criticism of pgsql-hackers,
> and I don't like that either.

I see. If there are bugs in logging module, no one can know research the cause.

> I can see the potential value of per-destination minimum message levels,
> so maybe you should just propose that.  But this is a bad place for a
> hook.

Features I tried to implement are following:

  * per-destination minimum message levels
  * per-destination log line prefix
        (syslog has their own prefix, but stderr has no default prefix)
  * per-category minimum message levels
        (don't write sql logs in syslog, but can write other LOGs)

I'll take a direction to make them into some pieces of core patches.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to