Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > The way I read the thread so far is that there are multiple > requirements:
> * Shrink a table efficiently - when time and space available to do so To be addressed by the CLUSTER-based solution (VACUUM REWRITE or whatever we call it). > * Shrink a table in place - when no space available To be addressed by the UPDATE-style tuple-mover (which could be thought of as VACUUM FULL rewritten to not use any special mechanisms). > * Shrink a table concurrently - when no dedicated time available Wishful thinking, which should not stop us from proceeding with the solutions we know how to implement. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers