On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > What we need is VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY. > > VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY is a contradiction in terms. Wishing it were > possible doesn't make it so.
It depends on what do you mean by "VACUUM FULL" if VACUUM FULL is just something that works on a table ends up with (mostly) compacted one, then doing this CONCURRENTLY should not be impossible. If you mean the current version of VACUUM FULL, then this is impossible indeed. -- Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability Services, Consulting and Training -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
