Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> Should we consider another generic options syntax, while we're on a
> roll? In the long run, that's the best way to avoid having a zillion
> keywords.
If there were any near-term prospect of more options for languages,
I might agree ... but there isn't, so I'm having a hard time getting
excited about this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
