On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > In that case, I think we should target this for the next CommitFest. > Especially given the number and complexity of the patches remaining > for this CommitFest, I feel very uncomfortable with the idea of > waiting another week for a new patch version, and then possibly still > needing further changes before it is finally committed. While we > allow patches to be resubmitted for the same CommitFest, this is > intended to be for minor adjustments, not significant rewrites.
OK, I expected that to be the case. I got significant feedback at the beginning of this commitfest that required some substantial language changes. I did find this commitfest extremely productive for my feature. Right now I'm trying to provide some useful feedback to Paval for his patch. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers