Tom, >> I thought the idea was to simply avoid that situation. Maybe we want to >> forget about global defaults if that's the case, and just do the ROLE >> defaults. > > That seems like a pretty dead-end design.
Well, the whole purpose for DefaultACLs is to simplify administration for the simplest use cases. If we add a large host of conflicting options, we haven't simplified stuff very much. > I already mentioned one case that there's longstanding demand for, which > is to instantiate the correct permissions on new partition child tables. Wouldn't that be handled by inheritance? > But more generally, this is a fairly large and complicated patch in > comparison to the reward, if the intention is that it will never support > anything more than the one case of "IN SCHEMA foo" filtering. I thought we were doing ROLEs? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
