2009/10/2 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION >> is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what it >> always has done and nobody's complained. > > +1.
+1 Pavel > > Stephen > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkrGMm4ACgkQrzgMPqB3kiiA5wCgis9FDnbm3wQ2cktKDxOK2hjL > ZqQAnRHl3rnXTki4WUBcS+iiZRWuzvSU > =Uq6m > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
