2009/10/4 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2009/10/4 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>: >> > Folks, >> > >> > At the moment, user-accessible RULEs have, as far as I know, just two >> > sane uses: >> > >> > * Writing to VIEWs >> > * Routing writes to partitions >> >> somebody use it as instead triggers. > > Some people also shoot themselves in the foot. They're mostly a > foot-gun.
it same as inheritance. BEFORE triggers should be a problem to (in some cases) > >> And I am sure, so there are people, who use it for writable views. > > That *is* the first case I mentioned. Your point is? sorry updateable views, is correct name. I know, so rules are dangerous gun, but I know so there are people, who use it. And actually we don't have a substitutions. I thing so if pg drop a rules. then it needs true updateable views and instead triggers. And maybe some as audit tools. When you would to to drop some functionality, then you have to propose a substitution. Pavel > > Cheers, > David. > -- > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
