Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
<marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
Right. This is exactly what I'm trying to do, except I think we could
easily optimize this case and store only the first processed row inside
the CTE.
why? we don't should be thinking in optimizations in this phase
Maybe you're right. This probably isn't a very common case any way.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
