On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >>>> - Is my approach reasonable? >>> >>> I thought the plan was to have libpq look at an environment variable, > >> I wasn't aware we had a plan :-) > > There was some previous discussion of this, which I am too lazy to look > up but I thought we had sketched out an API.
This seems to be the recent one, which is probably what was in the back of my mind when I decided to spend some spare time on this project: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01008.php There's no specific API discussion in either of the referenced threads though - just some vague hand waving and opining about what it should do and how it should look (pretty much all of which is covered by my patch). Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work on this :-( -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
