On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <rod.tay...@gmail.com> writes: > > I tried making a functional index based on an expression > > containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a > > reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of > > normal? > > regex_flavor affects its result.
Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC? I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
