Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> However, if the columnref looks like "x.y" where x happens to
>> match some table in the database (and not in the query) that doesn't
>> have a column y, the implicit-RTE code will have already modified the
>> querytree before finding out that column y doesn't exist.
> Hm, so if you do nothing then really the only thing that doesn't work
> is if you have add_missing_from then plpgsql record variables wouldn't
> work when you tried to reference their columns?
"Do nothing" isn't the right phrase here --- it would take a great deal
of work and ugly, hard-to-maintain code to get it to work even that badly.
The code paths in transformColumnRef are fairly messy already :-(.
Getting rid of add_missing_from would definitely make it easier to
refactor to support hooks for external variable sources.
The approach I had been thinking about proposing, before David piped up
with his modest proposal, was to have external variables take precedence
over implicit RTEs --- ie, we'd call the hook *before* trying the
add_missing_from case. But that seems pretty weird, and it'd still be
messy to program. What it would mainly accomplish is to avoid the extra
lock hazard.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
