Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think Pavel's entire line of argument is utter nonsense. > +1. I can't even understand why we're still arguing about this. Agreed. One premise of the whole concept was "don't even think of using it for security"[1]. That's not it's purpose; so any criticisms on that basis are irrelevant. Claims that it opens new security holes if you *don't* try to use it for this purpose don't seem to have any merit that I can see; I don't think Pavel has even attempted to put such an argument forward. -Kevin [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
