On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 12:52 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > What bothers me some is that it sounds like a bit of a footgun. A > postgres cluster is a shared resource, and we surely don't want > applications meddling with the shared config. This seems quite different > from, say, an application dropping a file in /etc/cron.d. > > I don't have strong feelings on it, but I do have some niggling worries.
Yes, that describes my mild unease about this a little better. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
