dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) writes: > As Tom says though, the effect this has on users is zero. The licence > is still the same as its always been, regardless of what we say it is > based on or looks like.
There may be a fairly miniscule one... There do exist "GPL zealots" that bash, as "not free" (in the sense that people are doubtless well aware of), stuff licensed under a "BSD license." There may be some non-zero advantage to saying "MIT style," in that this changes coasts ;-) and takes a micro-step away from the political aspects of "BSD vs GPL." But I'm not disagreeing with you, by any means! :-) -- select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'gmail.com'; http://linuxdatabases.info/info/emacs.html "I really only meant to point out how nice InterOp was for someone who doesn't have the weight of the Pentagon behind him. I really don't imagine that the Air Force will ever be able to operate like a small, competitive enterprise like GM or IBM." -- Kent England -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
