* Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | Depends on what you mean. For scaling well with many connections and | simultaneous queries, there's no reason IMHO that the current | process-per-backend model won't do, assuming the locking issues are | addressed.
Wouldn't a threading model allow you to share more data across different connections ? I'm thinking in terms of introducing more cache functionality to improve performance. What is shared memory used for today ? -- Gunnar Rønning - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
