2009/11/3 Tom Lane <[email protected]>: > Jeff Davis <[email protected]> writes: >> I'm not excited about using NOT, because I think it has a hint of a >> double-negative when combined with EXCLUSION. > > Well, the choice of EXCLUSION isn't set in stone either ... >
Is this really a generalized uniqueness constraint, extended to support operators other than = ? Perhaps sticking with the word UNIQUE might be more suggestive of this: UNIQUE (room_number WITH = , during WITH &&) or: UNIQUE (room_number , during USING && ) - Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
