"Florian G. Pflug" <f...@phlo.org> writes: > Still, doing that SELECT seems rather silly since NEW and OLD already > contain the required information. So I still believe that having > something like record_name() and record_types() would be useful. And at > least these functions have less of an issue with the type system...
Yeah. I don't have any objection in principle to providing such functions; I'm just wondering how far that really goes towards solving real-world problems. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers