On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 14:59 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > There's a race condition ....
Yes, I believe this is a major showstopper for the current approach/attempt....but... > I can't see any obvious way around that. Huh? We're only doing this strict locking approach because you insisted that the looser approach was not acceptable. Have you forgotten that discussion so completely that you can't even remember the existence of other options? It amazes me that you should then use locking overhead as the reason to not pursue the current approach further, which was exactly my argument for not pursuing it in the first place. You're leading me a merry dance. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
