On sön, 2009-11-15 at 12:37 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > At Tom's suggestion I am looking at allowing use of parameter names in > SQL functions instead of requiring use of $1 etc. That raises the > question of how we would disambiguate a parameter name from a column > name. Essentially, ISTM, we could use some special marker such as @ > (c.f. SQL Server) or : (c.f. ecpg) or else we could have some rule that > says which name takes precedence. I think I prefer a special marker, > other things being equal. Is there a standard on this?
Yes, search the SQL standard for <SQL parameter reference>. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
