Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm fuzzy on what problem this is attempting to solve... as mentioned >> in the above guidelines, it's usually good to start with some design >> discussions before writing/submitting code.
> This has been through some heavy design discussions with a few PG > hackers you know and some you don't, they just couldn't release the > result until now. Those discussions don't have a lot of credibility if they didn't take place on the public mailing lists. pgsql-hackers had some preliminary discussions a couple months back on refactoring COPY to allow things like this --- see the thread starting here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg00486.php While I don't think we arrived at any final decisions, I would like to know how this design fits in with what was discussed then. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
