On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
Oleg Bartunov <o...@sai.msu.su> writes:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
I think you altered the wrong function. The function underlying
point <@ box is on_pb() not pt_contained_box ... in fact, I don't
even see a function named that.
sorry, I forgot to say, that I created operator
Unless you changed search_path, I think the parser would have preferred
the built-in point <@ box operator to one in "public". Are you sure
your code was being used at all?
oops, you were right. Sorry, for noise.
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: o...@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
