Peter Eisentraut wrote: > When using the "service" parameter in a libpq connection (e.g., psql > service=foo), and the service name is not defined in pg_service.conf, > then the setting is silently ignored and the connection proceeds with > whatever other settings and defaults apply. That does not look very > robust. Shouldn't there be an error when a specified service name does > not exist?
I agree. It leads to strange error messages at least (I didn't want to connect to port 5432 on localhost?!?), and you could end up connecting to a different database than you wanted without noticing it. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
