On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> Updated application name patch, including a GUC assign hook to clean >> the application name of any unsafe characters, per discussion. > > Applied with assorted editorialization. There were a couple of > definitional issues that I don't recall if we had consensus on:
Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample? That is expected to be set from only libpq? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
