Tom Lane escreveu: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> So, if someone writes a patch, and it is reviewed, and the patch author >> updates the patch and replies, it still should be reviewed again before >> being committed? > > Well, that's for the reviewer to say --- if the update satisfies his > concerns, he should sign off on it, if not not. I've tried to avoid > pre-empting that process. > That's correct. I didn't have time to review the new patch yet. :( I'll do it later today. IIRC Tom had some objections (during the last CF) the way the patch was proposed and suggested changes. Let's see if the Takahiro-san did everything that was suggested.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
